Another one bites the dust

 Fiat Chrysler following in the footsteps of disgraced German automaker Volkswagen?

Storied Italian powerhouse Fiat Chrysler (FCA) saw its share price tumble over 18% in the afternoon trading session on 12 January 2017, shedding almost €2.4 billion in market value.

The carnage began around 3:15 p.m. when it was reported that US environmental watchdog, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) intends to accuse the automaker of using engine management software to exceed diesel emissions in 104,000 vehicles. The EPA alleged that these violations of the Clean Air Act manifested themselves when FCA failed to disclose the existence of this software in its light-duty models in 2014 and 2015, the 2016 Jeep Grand Cherokee, and Doge Ram 1500 trucks. Shares were down 10% when markets closed. The EPA actions could result in fines of up to $4.6 billion for FCA as reported by the Wall Street Journal. Such a fine is more than the company’s combined profits from 2013 through to the first nine months of 2016.  

Monte dei Paschi di Siena: from helping the poor to emptying state coffers

More than seven years after the Great Recession, the bailout saga continues. The failure of the Italian referendum on December 4, 2016 and the subsequent resignation of Prime Minister Matteo Renzi’s government sent markets into a tailspin and stopped Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena’s (BMPS) restructuring plan in its tracks as understandably jittery investors refused to commit capital. With almost €47 billion in gross non-performing loans (NPLs), the beleaguered bank turned to Rome for a third potential bailout since the financial crisis.

Mike Ashley as Ebenezer Scrooge in 21st century retelling of A Christmas Carol

  “I’m not Father Christmas; I’m not sitting here saying I’ll make the world wonderful”

http://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/a870989f-3119-4e2a-9ea7-e6ab094e77d1

Father Christmas he is not, but rather Mike Ashley.

The founder and controlling shareholder (55% of share capital) of Sports Direct appeared before the UK parliament last June to plead his case. In a comical display of showmanship while sporting the black and white colours of Newcastle United on his tie, Mike Ashley defended his company’s record, downplayed the allegations levelled against Sports Direct, and evidently made several references to Santa Claus and Christmas.

LSE-Deutsche Börse: Winter is here!

 Will the deal survive post-Brexit?

We have all heard executives at both companies tout the benefits of this marriage: creating a global derivatives powerhouse to rival the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and CME Group; becoming a leader in post-trade services, and of course a pioneer in market data as the combined entity would own the FTSE Russel, STOXX, and DAX indices.

However, the question on everybody’s mind remains: how will the UK’s historic vote to leave the EU weigh in on the deal? The risks are nothing short of real as executives reiterated ad nauseam in the days following the referendum that the deal will continue as planned. We are not so sure.

DSW to enforce special audit at Volkswagen by court decision

Despite heated debates at the general meeting of Volkswagen, voting results did not come as a surprise.

The company’s major shareholders, Porsche Automobil Holding SE (controlled by the Porsche/Piech family) , the government of Lower Saxony,  and Qatar Holding LLC ( private equity arm of Qatar Investment Authority), which collectively hold around 90% of the company’s voting rights voted against DSW’s resolutions to appoint an independent special auditor.

Shareholders brace themselves for ‘Dieselgate’ at Volkswagen (VW)

 It all started with a group of five scientists at the University of West Virginia. During live road tests, these scientists discovered that emissions from certain VW diesel engines exceeded limits set by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A larger probe by the EPA and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) corroborated these findings and found that VW had intentionally programmed its diesel engines to reduce nitrogen oxide levels during emissions testing in order to meet US standards. The ensuing scandal, made worse by the fact that the company shirked its responsibility to shareholders and intentionally hid these findings from the public for almost a year, culminated with the collapse in the share price and the resignation of Martin Winterkorn, its CEO and Ferdinand K. Piëch, its Chairman.   

More troublingly, the automaker reneged on its previous promise to release the finding of an investigative report surrounding the scandal by law firm Jones Day in April 2016 citing ‘unacceptable risks’ that may ‘jeopardize’ its ongoing negotiations with the US Department of Justice (DOJ), EPA, CARB, and Attorneys General from fifty US states.

Sir Martin Sorrel draws shareholder ire

Shareholder revolts taking the 2016 AGM season by storm in the UK do not seem to be losing any steam.

In what is building up to be an unusual season of anger over executive compensation, shareholders have rejected remuneration packages at BP (59%), Smith & Nephew (53%), and Weir (72%; pay policy) and mounted serious challenges at Shire (49%), Anglo American (42%), Reckitt Benckiser (42%), Ladbrokes (42%), CRH (40%), and Man Group (37%). WPP joined the fray yesterday where 33.5% of shareholders outraged by Sir Martin Sorrel’s ballooning pay voted against the remuneration report.

 

Will Carlos Ghosn for ever stay entrenched at Renault and at Nissan ?

 

Renault SA presents to the vote on April 29th. in resolutions 5 and 6 two related party agreements, one with its first shareholder the French State and the other one with its listed Japanese giant subsidiary Nissan Motors.  This so called  ‘stabilization agreement’  follows the adoption of a double voting right provision last year imposed by the French State and it includes an unexpected revision of the original balance of power between Renault and Nissan Motors. While this situation was foreseen by observers, for Proxinvest, this unneeded change is actually a “coup d’état” by Carlos Ghosn, the Chairman & CEO of two listed and integrated groups, arranged with the complacency of the Renault directors and insuring him a perfectly entrenched position as perpetual tycoon. For the record, under the 1999 agreement, Renault owns 43.44% of Nissan while Nissan owns 15% of Renault but has no voting rights. The French government has been since 1945  the largest shareholder , holding at the time of the alliance with Nissan  44% of Renault’s capital and now only 19.74%,  but since the  Florange law 23.56% of the voting rights.

Syndicate content